论编纂“知识产权通则”入典的合理性——以知识产权与民事权利的事实依据为视角  

On the Rationalities of the Legislation of“General Rules of Intellectual Property”into the Civil Code——From the angle of factual basis in both intellectual property and civil rights

作　　者：任江 REN Jiang

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学博士后流动站

出　　处：《求是学刊》2019年第6期92-101,共10页Seeking Truth

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金项目“新型权利兴起与私法制度变革研究”（2018M632070）

摘　　要：运用马克思主义全面生产理论分析可发现,生活生产与精神生产分别决定了民事权利与知识产权的事实依据。民法的调整对象是主体之间的生活生产社会关系,其本质是不同主体间的生活生产社会关系矛盾,而精神生产过程中形成的不同主体间的精神生产社会关系矛盾,则是知识产权法的本质与调整对象。因二者调整对象均属于社会全面生产在法律上的表现形式,故其必然存在着"公因式",使知识产权法可以以"通则"的形式纳入民法典,但生活生产与精神生产内容的不同,决定了相关权利基础的事实依据存在客观差异,必然难以完全融入同一规范依据之中。Through the study of the social all-round production theory of Marxism, human living production and ideological production pattern separately determine civil rights and intellectual property rights. Adjustment objects of civil law are the social relations of living production. Its essence is the contradiction of social relations of living production among different subjects. However, the contradiction of spiritual production relations among different subjects in the process of spiritual production are the essence and adjustment objects of intellectual property law. Because civil rights and intellectual property rights both belong to social all-round producing results in legal form, they must share some common factors. Therefore, the intellectual property law can be in the form of"general principles"in the civil code. However, the different contents of human living production and ideological production determine that the basis of related rights objective differs objectively,which makes them unable to legislate in the same code.

关 键 词：知识产权 民法典 民法哲学 马克思主义 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]