检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴何奇 Wu Heqi
机构地区:[1]上海财经大学法学院
出 处:《法治社会》2020年第2期76-86,共11页Law-Based Society
摘 要:在国际和平与安全的议题中,恐怖主义是当今世界各国面临的主要威胁。在应对恐怖主义的问题上,国内刑事法的局限以及国际刑事法院对恐怖主义犯罪管辖权的缺位导致对大规模恐怖组织的打击仍依赖于武力的途径。然而,传统国际法中的自卫权理论似乎难以为武力反恐行为的合法性提供有力的支撑,武力反恐对自卫权规则下的“武力攻击”的解释、时间规则的限制以及“韦伯斯特原则”的要求都产生了冲击与挑战。此外,有鉴于恐怖组织实力的提升,恐怖组织对国家的威胁与日俱增,在此背景下,重新审视预先性自卫的合法性尤为必要。Among the issues of international peace and security,terrorism is the main threat faced by all countries in the world today.In dealing with terrorism,the limitations of domestic criminal law and the absence of jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over terrorist crimes lead to the fact that the crackdown on large-scale terrorist organizations still depends on the use of force.However,the traditional theory of self-defense right in international law seems to be difficult to provide strong support for the legitimacy of the act of anti-terrorism by force.Anti-terrorism by force brings impacts and challenges to the interpretation of“armed attack”under the rule of self-defense right,the limitation of the rule of time and the requirements of the Webster principle.In addition,in view of the enhancement of the strength of terrorist organizations and the threat of terrorist organizations growing day by day,it is particularly necessary to re-examine the legitimacy of preventive self-defense.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229