检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁铭蔚 冯硕[1] Yuan Mingwei;Feng Shuo
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学国际法学院
出 处:《北京仲裁》2019年第3期88-107,共20页Beijing Arbitration Quarterly
基 金:2018年度北京仲裁委员会/北京国际仲裁中心科研基金资助项目“互联网时代背景下商事仲裁保密性再探讨”(编号:2018-07)的阶段性成果
摘 要:基于当事人意思自治的本质,保密性始终是国际商事仲裁的重要特征。传统观点认为,由私人化延伸出的保密性理应是国际商事仲裁中的一项默示规定。但随着仲裁默示保密暴露出的种种问题,加之近年来对仲裁透明度改革的呼声越来越高,国际商事仲裁保密性正不断从默示向明示转变。从实践来看,仲裁保密的明示相较于默示更符合现代商业社会的发展趋势,也更适应仲裁公正与效率的价值需求。而在这一趋势下,各方应聚焦实践重新构建仲裁的保密性规则,推动仲裁保密性在现代商业社会下的新发展。Because of the party autonomy,privacy and confidentiality are international commercial arbitration features.In the traditional prospective,the confidentiality came from the privacy of commercial arbitration and became the implied provision in international commercial arbitration.However,with more and more drawbacks of the confidentiality of arbitration exposed and the impact of the transparency of arbitration increasing,the theory of confidentiality in international commercial arbitration is changing from opt-out to opt-in.In practice,the opt-in in confidentiality is more in line with the development of modern commercial arbitration,and more suitable to the requirements of fairness and efficiency in arbitration.Under this trend,all parties shall focus on reconstructing the rules of confidentiality in arbitration,and promote the new development of the confidentiality in the modern commercial arbitration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.27.146