标准必要专利权人滥用市场支配地位的行为类型——以“美国FTC诉高通垄断案”为视角  

Types of Abuse of Dominant Market Position by Standard Essential Patent Holders—From the Perspective of"Federal Trade Commission v.Qualcomm,Inc."

作　　者：谭羽 TAN Yu(School of Economic Law,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学经济法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《中国发明与专利》2020年第3期100-106,共7页China Invention & Patent

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“移动互联网领域反垄断法实施疑难问题研究”(18BFX149)。

摘　　要：2019年5月21日,美国加州北部地区法院对美国联邦贸易委员会(The Federal Trade Commission,FTC)诉高通公司垄断案作出初审判决,确认高通公司实施的“无许可、无芯片”商业模式、拒绝许可、不公平高价许可和排他性交易等滥用行为违法。本案初审判决一出,国内外反垄断理论与实务界对本案的判决结果和案件走向议论纷纷。通过冷静思考本案中相关滥用行为事实与法律问题,可以较为清楚地了解目前标准必要专利权人滥用市场支配地位行为的常见类型,并预测未来标准必要专利专利人实施滥用行为的趋势,这对我国运用反垄断法规制标准必要专利滥用行为具有良好的启示意义。On May 21,2019,the Northern District Court of California made a court decision on the FTC v.Qualcomm Monopoly case,and found that Qualcommun's implementation of the"No license,no chip"business strategy,refusal of patent licensing,unfair high-price licensing and exclusive deals are illegal.The first decision-making has aroused the antitrust theory and practice circles at home and abroad discussing the judgment result and trend of this case.By considering the facts and legal problems of the relevant abuses in this case,we can clearly understand the common types of the current standard essential patentee's abuse of dominant position in the market,and forecast the trend of the future standard essential patentee's abuse,which has good enlightenment significance to the application of anti-monopoly law to regulate the necessary patent abuse behavior in our country.

关 键 词：标准必要专利 滥用市场支配地位 反垄断法 

分 类 号：G306[文化科学]