检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马健[1] 胡文业[2] MA Jian;HU Wen-ye(The Third People's Hospital of Datong,Datong Shanxi,037008;School of Medicine,Shanxi Datong University,Datong Shanxi,037009)
机构地区:[1]大同市第三人民医院骨科,山西大同037008 [2]山西大同大学医学院,山西大同037009
出 处:《山西大同大学学报(自然科学版)》2020年第1期50-51,共2页Journal of Shanxi Datong University(Natural Science Edition)
摘 要:目的研究骨科创伤临床治疗的有效方法。方法选取骨科创伤患者120例,按床号奇偶性分为对照组与研究组,对照组接受常规换药治疗,研究组做负压封闭引流技术,对比2组治疗效果。结果研究组临床总有效率明显高于对照组,且创伤修复时间、伤口愈合时间、创面完全愈合时间均优于对照组。结论采用负压封闭引流技术治疗骨科创伤较传统治疗方法更优。Objective To study the effective methods of clinical treatment of orthopaedic trauma.Methods 120 patients with ortho⁃paedic trauma were selected and divided into control group and research group according to the parity of bed number.The control group received routine dressing change,while the research group received negative pressure sealing drainage technology.The therapeu⁃tic effects of the two groups were compared.Results The total clinical effective rate of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group,and the wound healing time,wound healing time and complete wound healing time were better than those of the control group.Conclusion Negative pressure sealing drainage is better than traditional treatment for orthopaedic trauma.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30