分期与断限:20世纪中国历史撰述中的“古史”表述  

Staging and Timelines: Expressions of "Ancient History" in the 20th Century′s Chinese Historical Narration

作　　者：王兴 WANG Xing(School of Marxism Studies,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学马克思主义学院,北京100872

出　　处：《廊坊师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2020年第1期63-72,96,共11页Journal of Langfang Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“中国马克思主义史学的发展历程及重大问题研究”(19JJD770004)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在20世纪的中国历史撰述中,对"古史"有多种表述方式,大致为:"三段分期法"中的"上古史","特征分期法"中的"古史","断代史"中的"先秦史","五种社会形态"中的"古史"。不同表述之间,既有区别又有联系,同时隐含着史家对于"古史"的不同认知。在不同的中国历史撰述之中,"古代"一词的内涵及"古代史"所指的时间范围也有不同。使用"古史"一词,不应以今日通行的"古代史"概念统称,而应返回到具体的历史情形和文本语境中。回顾和审视20世纪中国历史撰述中对"古史"的不同表述,不仅对当今的中国古史编纂具有参考价值,而且对建构中国特色的古史观的理论结构和知识体系也有借鉴意义。In Chinese historical narration of the 20 th century, there have been many ways to express "ancient history", such as "ancient history" in three stages, "ancient history" in characteristic stages, "pre-Qin history" in dynastic history, "ancient history" in five social forms and so on. There are differences and relations between different expressions, which imply different cognition of "ancient history" by historians. In different Chinese historical narrations, the connotation of the word "ancient" and the time range referred to by "ancient history" are also different. The use of the term "ancient history" should not be referred to as the general concept of "ancient history", but should return to the specific historical situation and textual context. Reviewing and examining the different expressions of "ancient history" in Chinese historical narration of the 20 th century is not only of reference value for today’s compilation of Chinese ancient history, but also of reference significance for constructing the theoretical structure and knowledge system of ancient history view with Chinese characteristics.

关 键 词：中国历史撰述 分期 古史 古史观 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]