检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱俊庆 Zhu Junqing(Zhou Enlai School of Government , Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China)
机构地区:[1]南开大学周恩来政府管理学院,天津300071
出 处:《环境科学与管理》2020年第1期13-18,共6页Environmental Science and Management
摘 要:协同治理绩效评估是大气污染协同治理的重要环节。运用环境质量评价PSR模型和AHP层次分析法,构建大气污染区域政府间协同治理绩效评价指标体系,对2015年到2017年京津冀大气污染政府间协同治理绩效进行实证评估。分析结果显示北京“压力”和“状态”指标持续优化;天津市部分“状态”指标下滑,大气污染治理成效优于河北;河北省“压力”指标持续改善,部分“状态”指标有下滑的趋向,协同治理成效劣于京津两地。从加强法律保障、增进利益共享等方面破解协同治理困境。The collaborative governance is an important part of means to evaluate air pollution.Using the PSR model of environmental quality evaluation and AHP analytic hierarchy process,the paper constructs the performance evaluation index system of air pollution regional intergovernmental collaborative governance,and makes an empirical evaluation on the performance of Beijing Tianjin Hebei air pollution intergovernmental collaborative governance from 2015 to 2017.The results show that Beijing's“pressure”and“state”indicators continue to optimize;Tianjin's“state”indicators decline,and the effect of air pollution control is better than Hebei's;Hebei's“pressure”indicators continue to improve,and some“state”indicators tend to decline,and the effect of collaborative governance is worse than Beijing and Tianjin.To solve the dilemma of collaborative governance,it is suggested to strengthen the legal protection and promote the benefit sharing.
分 类 号:X823[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229