检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冯猛[1] Feng Meng
机构地区:[1]上海师范大学社会学系
出 处:《社会学研究》2020年第2期124-145,M0005,共23页Sociological Studies
基 金:上海哲学社会科学规划课题“政府创新的路径选择与驱动效应”(2015ESH001);上海师范大学城市社会学创新团队项目的阶段性成果。
摘 要:本文尝试在理论层面建构一个理解地方政府创新行为逻辑的“风险—绩效”分析框架:地方政府在创新行动中有风险规避和行政绩效获取两个具体目标。一方面,地方政府会选取可支配程度高及相关主体认可的要素实施创新,以规避创新风险;另一方面,地方政府会扩展创新要素规模和增加要素组合程度,以获取行政绩效。以K市社区公益招投标创新为例,地方政府创新的过程可分为创意形成、创新政策转化、政策试点和全面实施四个阶段,地方政府部门在不同阶段权衡目标追求,选择相应的行动策略,并通过严格控制创新过程,最大限度地谋求创新效用。This paper attempts to construct an analytic framework for“risk performance”to help understand the logic of local government innovation.Local governments have two specific objectives,i.e.,risk aversion and administrative performance acquisition in innovative actions.On the one hand,local governments choose institutions with a high degree of controllability and relevant subject recognition to avoid innovation risks.On the other hand,local governments expand the scale of innovation factors and increase the combination of factors to obtain administrative performance.In the innovation case of community public welfare bidding in city K,the process can be divided into four stages:creative formation,innovation policy transformation,policy pilot and comprehensive implementation.Local government departments weigh the pursuit of goals at different stages,choose the corresponding action strategies,and maximize the effectiveness of innovation by strictly controlling the innovation process.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249