检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李懿艺[1] LIYi-yi(School of Law,Sun yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510275,China)
机构地区:[1]中山大学法学院,广州510275
出 处:《嘉应学院学报》2020年第1期56-60,共5页Journal of Jiaying University
摘 要:新时代下粤港澳大湾区的法治建设具有重要的实践价值与示范意义。由于内地与港澳地区在法律制度上存在的种种差异,导致粤港澳大湾区内在刑事法律适用问题上存在不可避免的分歧,增大了该区域对跨境违法犯罪行为的管控风险与打击难度,难以充分保障与服务粤港澳大湾区的区域创新。解决之道在于充分评估三地刑事法律制度的异同,总结与反思现有刑事法律适用模式与存在问题,创新和探索具有中国特色的刑事司法协助体系,完善粤港澳大湾区刑事法律适用的思路与对策。In the new era,the law construction in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area has a strong demonstration value.Due to various differences in legal systems between the China's Mainland,Hong Kong and Macao,there are inevitable differences in the application of criminal laws in the GBA,which increases the risk control of crimes,and is not conducive to the regional innovation of the GBA.The solution lies in fully assessing the similarities and differences of the three criminal legal systems,to summarize and reflect on the existing criminal law application mode,innovate and explore the criminal judicial assistance system,and improve the ideas for the application of criminal law in the GBA.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145