不起诉契约效力之否定及缘由探究  

Study on the Negation of the Effect of Non-prosecution Contract and its Reasons

作　　者：黄月婷 HUANG Yue-ting(Institute of Law,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《集宁师范学院学报》2020年第1期56-60,共5页Journal of Jining Normal University

摘　　要：不起诉契约的达成使私人行为产生诉讼法效果,契约当事人私法自治原则与国家诉权保障的公法性冲突据此产生。为平衡法益冲突,不起诉契约的规范解释与理论本源剖析为关键之处。自古罗马法萌发的诉权理论发展规律体现私人请求权同公法程式的本质区别,私法自治不经过立法规范明确难以体现在诉讼过程与结果。同时,国家为保障公民基本权诉权,以制度消耗与司法成本为代价,公法秩序的维持不允许私法自治肆意破坏。The conclusion of non-prosecution contract makes private behaviors generate the effect in the procedural law,and thus causing the conflict between the principle of autonomy of private law of contracting parties and the national public law guaranteeing the just claim.In order to resolve the conflict on legal interests,the normative interpretation and theoretical analysis of non-prosecution contract are the key points.The development law of the just claim theory originated from ancient Roman law reflects the essential difference between private right of claim and public law procedure.Autonomy of private law can hardly be embodied in litigation process and result without legislative norms.At the same time,in order to protect citizens"just claim which is a basic right,the state,at the cost of system consumption and judicial cost,maintains the public law order by not allowing the jeopardizing by autonomy of private law.

关 键 词：不起诉契约 私法自治 基本权 诉权保障 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]