检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:康浩 Kang Hao
机构地区:[1]中央财经大学法学院
出 处:《学术前沿》2020年第4期124-127,共4页Frontiers
摘 要:随着公私法交融和私法社会化,比例原则逐渐融入以民法为主的私法中,正当防卫和紧急避险制度等民法制度体现出比例原则“禁止过度”的价值理念。比例原则适用于民事立法、执法和司法领域,但并不能普遍适用于民事领域。民事领域遵循意思自治、诚实信用、禁止权利滥用等基本原则,比例原则跨越公法部门进入民事领域并非天然适当。比例原则虽不能成为民法基本原则,但可透过内在体系的实质精神内容拓展外在体系的具体规则条款,以期融入民法来实现其价值。With the integration of the public and private laws and the socialization of private laws, the principle of proportionality is gradually embedded into the private laws, with a focus on the civil law. The civil law arrangements such as self-defense and emergency avoidance embody the value concept of "prohibition of excess" which belongs to the principle of proportionality. This principle is applicable to the field of civil legislation, law enforcement and judiciary, but it cannot be generally applied to all of the civil law areas. The basic principles of autonomy of will, good faith and prohibition of abuse of rights are adopted in judging the civil law cases. But it is not natural and appropriate for the principle of proportionality to go outside the public law sector and enter the civil field. Although it cannot become the basic principle of the civil law, it can expand the specific rules and provisions of the external system through the essential spiritual content of the internal system in order to realize its value by integrating into the civil law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.14