检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐修桥 周楷淳 李晓青[1] 代杰 刘旺彤 王瑞珺 XU Xiu-qiao;ZHOU Kai-chun;LI Xiao-qing;DAI Jie;LIU Wang-tong;WANG Rui-jun(College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)
机构地区:[1]湖南师范大学资源与环境科学学院,中国长沙410081
出 处:《湖南师范大学自然科学学报》2020年第2期27-34,共8页Journal of Natural Science of Hunan Normal University
基 金:国家重点研发计划资助项目(2016YFC0502406)。
摘 要:本文以湖南省湘乡市村庄规划11个试点村为例,通过问卷调查,得到参与主体对宅基地整理的意愿数据,结合自然及区位、社会经济等方面限制因素,运用人均宅基地标准法和多因素综合评价法,测算出11个村的宅基地整理现实潜力。村庄规划将11个村划分为城郊融合类、特色保护类、拆迁撤并类、集聚提升类和其他类5种类型。本文通过比较5种类型村庄的整理潜力测算结果,得出以下结论:11个村平均理论潜力占宅基地总面积的39.70%,现实潜力占理论潜力的72.62%。不同类型的村庄整理潜力存在较大差异,拆迁撤并类和集聚提升类村庄理论潜力较大,城郊融合类与其他类村庄理论潜力较小。城郊融合类和集聚提升类村庄自然及区位和经济限制性较小,农户整理意愿相对更低,现实潜力较小;而拆迁撤并类、特色保护类和其他类的村庄自然及区位和经济限制性较大,但农户整理意愿更为强烈,现实潜力较大。This paper takes 11 pilot villages in Xiangxiang city,Hunan province as an example.Through questionnaire survey,the data of willingness of participants to organize their homesteads is obtained.Combining the constraints of nature,location and social economy,the standard of per capita homestead is used.The method and multi-factor comprehensive evaluation method are used to calculate the realistic potential of the homesteads of 11 villages.The village plan divides 11 villages into five types:suburban villages,characteristic protected villages,demolition villages,gathering villages and other types of villages.By comparing the results of the consolidation potential of five types of villages,this paper draws the following conclusions:the average theoretical potential of 11 villages accounts for 39.70%of the total housing area,and the actual potential accounts for 72.62%of the theoretical potential.There are great differences in the sorting potentials of different types of villages.The theoretical potential of demolition villages and gathering villages is relatively large,and the theoretical potential of suburban villages and other types of villages is small.Suburban villages and gathering villages are less natural and location-restricted,less willingness for farmers to organize,and less realistic potential.However,the demolition villages,characteristic protected villages and other types of villages are more natural and location-oriented and economically restrictive,but farmers’willingness to organize is stronger and the potential for reality is greater.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.188.252