检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王跃[1] 蔡琪 WANG Yue;CAI Qi(School of criminal investigation,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出 处:《广西警察学院学报》2020年第1期20-27,共8页Journal of Guangxi Police College
摘 要:我国经济快速发展所带来的环境问题层出不穷,其中环境损害司法鉴定制度改革创新成为研究热点。我国环境损害司法鉴定制度存在概念混淆、鉴定机构和人员配置不科学、制度运行机制不合理等问题,应从厘清环境损害司法鉴定制度概念,完善资格准入评审、构建高质量鉴定体系,将协同工作机制转向分离工作机制,引入多种鉴定机构构建方式,合理对待不同级别司法鉴定机构等方面予以完善。China’s rapid economic development gives birth to endless environmental problems, of which reform and innovation of judicial identification system for environmental damage turns to be a research focus. China’s judicial identification system for environmental damage still witnesses confusing concept, unscientific accreditation agencies and staffing and unreasonable system operation mechanism. Therefore, efforts need to be made to clarify the concept of environmental damage appraisal system, improve accreditation process, construct high quality identification system,shift the collaborative working mechanism to the separate working mechanism, introduce various ways to construct identification institutions, and reasonably treat different levels of judicial identification institutions.
分 类 号:D922.68[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28