检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:侯欣一[1] Hou Xinyi
出 处:《南开学报(哲学社会科学版)》2020年第2期10-21,共12页Nankai Journal:Philosophy,Literature and Social Science Edition
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点研究项目(18AFX-004)。
摘 要:现代法治在中国肇始于清末民初,百年间经历了"法政""政法"两种既有联系又差异较大的类型。在学界既有的"革命范式""近代化范式"基础上,将"法治"作为分析工具揭示"法政"和"政法"的制度差异,并探讨从法政到政法的背后逻辑,可以从法理上对中国近现代法治进程进行整体性审视。The rule of law in modern China began in the later years of the Qing Dynasty and the earlier time of the Republic of China, and it had experienced two kinds of related but also very different relations between"the law-andpolitics system"and"the politics-and-law system". On the basis of the existing"revolution paradigm"and"modernization paradigm", this paper, with"the rule of law"as an analysis tool, attempts to reveal the institutional differences between the law-and-politics system and the politics-and-law system, as well as to explore the evolutionary logic from the law-and-politics system to the politics-and-law system. It purports to provide an integrative investigation on the evolution of the rule of law in modern China from the perspective of jurisprudence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49