护理干预对继发性肝癌患者TACE治疗前后SAS评分的影响  

Effect of Nursing Intervention on SAS Score of Patients with Secondary Liver Cancer before and after TACE Treatment

作　　者：刘晓静 LIU Xiao-jing(Panjin Liaoyou Baoshihua Hospital,Panjin 124010,China)

机构地区：[1]盘锦辽油宝石花医院,辽宁盘锦124010

出　　处：《中国医药指南》2020年第8期3-4,共2页Guide of China Medicine

摘　　要：目的探究护理干预对继发性肝癌患者TACE治疗前后SAS评分的影响。方法选取我院肝胆外科2016年6月至2019年6月期间收治的42例继发性肝癌患者作为研究对象。将所有患者按照护理方式不同分成实验组、对照组,每组各21例。予以所有患者TACE治疗,同时,对照组患者采取常规护理,实验组患者采取系统化护理干预。观察、对比两组患者治疗前后焦虑情绪改善情况。结果两组患者治疗后SAS评分比治疗前低,且实验组比对照组低,P<0.05。实验组患者不良反应发生率4.76%,比对照组28.57%低,P<0.05。结论予以行TACE治疗的继发性肝癌患者系统化护理干预可有效缓解患者不良情绪,更利于手术治疗,降低患者术后不良反应发生率,值得临床大力推广及应用。Objective To explore the effect of nursing intervention on SAS score of patients with secondary liver cancer before and after TACE treatment.Methods 42 patients with secondary liver cancer admitted to our hospital from June 2016 to June 2019 were selected as the study subjects.All patients were divided into experimental group and control group according to different nursing methods,with 21 cases in each group.All patients were treated with TACE.At the same time,patients in the control group were given routine nursing,while patients in the experimental group were given systematic nursing intervention.The improvement of anxiety was observed and compared between the two groups before and after treatment.Results The SAS score of the two groups after treatment was lower than that before treatment,and that of the experimental group was lower than that of the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in the experimental group was 4.76%lower than that in the control group(28.57%,P<0.05).Conclusion Systematic nursing intervention for secondary liver cancer patients treated with TACE can effectively alleviate patients’bad mood,be more conducive to surgical treatment,and reduce the incidence of adverse reactions after operation.It is worth popularizing and applying in clinic.

关 键 词：护理干预 继发性肝癌 TACE SAS评分 

分 类 号：R473.73[医药卫生—护理学]