检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李竺阳 胡利红 Li Zhuyang;Hu Lihong(Civil Aviation University of China,Tianjin 300300 China)
机构地区:[1]中国民航大学,天津300300
出 处:《中国民航飞行学院学报》2020年第2期61-66,共6页Journal of Civil Aviation Flight University of China
基 金:中国民航大学大学生创新创业基金资助项目(201910059027)。
摘 要:本文围绕强人工智能在民法中地位存在的分歧进行论述。首先,阐述强人工智能成为民事责任主体合理性与可行性。同时也不忽视强人工智能成为民事责任主体还存在责任制度、社会因素方面的困境,并针对其责任承担情形不明确,目前没有独立财产以及社会伦理问题提出相应的困境破除方案。This paper focuses on the differences in the position of strong artificial intelligence in civil law.First of all,the paper expounds the rationality and feasibility of strong artificial intelligence becoming the subject of civil liability.At the same time,we should not neglect that there are still some difficulties in the responsibility system and social factors for strong artificial intelligence to become the subject of civil liability.In view of the unclear situation of its responsibility,there is no independent property and social ethical issues to put forward corresponding solutions to the difficulties.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3