P2P网络借贷纠纷中管辖问题的实证分析  

The Jurisdiction’s Empirical Analysis of P2P Internet Lending Disputes

作　　者：杨星晨 Yang Xingchen(School of Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律硕士教育中心,上海200042

出　　处：《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》2020年第1期112-118,共7页Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law

摘　　要：P2P网络借贷是一种创新型的交易模式,近些年来,虽然P2P暴雷事件频繁发生,但P2P的合法合理运用给经济市场带来的积极作用却不容忽视。为了规范P2P网贷,学术界大多都是从实体法层面进行研究,但实体权利的实现也离不开程序的保障,而管辖问题是诉讼程序公正有效进行的基础。在司法实务中,大部分P2P案件都被定性为合同纠纷,从而确定管辖法院,当事人的诉讼权利得不到保障。要想在程序法上为P2P案件的当事人保驾护航,需要对管辖的一般性问题进行研究,如P2P案件中"争议标的"和"被告住所地"的定性问题,也须对其在实务中涉及的特殊问题进行探究,即依据合同的具体性质能否作为抗辩事由、侵害财产权益案件能否适用侵权诉讼管辖原则等管辖问题。P2P Internet Lending is a new trading model.Recently,P2P disputes occurred frequently,but the positive effect of P2P cannot be ignored.To protect the legal interests of the parties in P2P,academics focused on research in substantive law.The substantive rights cannot be separated from the guarantee of procedure,and jurisdictional issues are the basis for fair and effective proceedings.In practice,most P2P cases are characterized as courts of jurisdiction for contractual disputes,and the parties’ rights are not guaranteed.So,a study of the general issues of jurisdiction is necessary,such as how to determine "subject of dispute" and "forum domicilii".It is also necessary to explore the special issues involved in its practice,whether the specific nature of the contract is a defense,and whether the jurisdiction of tort proceedings is fit to the cases of infringement of property rights and interests.

关 键 词：P2P网络借贷 合同纠纷管辖 侵权诉讼管辖 被告住所地 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]