检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王龑
机构地区:[1]大连银行,辽宁大连116025
出 处:《浙江金融》2020年第1期70-80,27,共12页Zhejiang Finance
摘 要:本文检验了地方政府行为对地方银行经营绩效的影响,发现:(1)"地方保护"具有"保护之手"作用,"行政干预"具有"良性引导"作用,二者有利于降低地方银行的盈利波动性、提升地方银行的运营稳健性。(2)对于资产规模较小的银行、未设立省外分行的银行,"地方保护"和"行政干预"的积极影响较大;对于高技术产业投资比较活跃的地区,"地方保护"和"行政干预"的积极影响较大。(3)当省内经济增长率领先于全国水平时,"地方保护"和"行政干预"依然发挥积极作用;然而,当省内经济增长率落后于全国水平时,"地方保护"会产生"约束之手"作用,"行政干预"会产生"恶性引导"作用,二者反而会加剧地方银行的盈利波动性、降低地方银行的运营稳健性。This paper explore the effect of local government’s behavior on regional banks’ performance. We get the conclusions that local protectionism and government intervene not only could reduce regional banks’ profit volatility, but also could enhance regional banks’ robustness. The lower the level of assets, the more the effects of local protectionism and government intervene on regional banks. For non-cross-regional banks, local protectionism and government intervene have higher impacts. The more active investment in high-tech industry, the more the effects of local protectionism and government intervene on regional banks. When the local economic growth rate is ahead of the national level, local protectionism and government intervene still play an active role, but when the local economic growth rate falls behind the national level, local protectionism and government intervene will increase regional banks’ profit volatility and reduce regional banks’ robustness.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.121.190