检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韩鹏[1] 李宇航[1] 揭晓蒙 HAN Peng;LI Yu-hang;JIE Xiao-meng(Administrative Center for China's Agenda 21,Beijing 100038,China)
出 处:《海洋技术学报》2020年第1期107-113,共7页Journal of Ocean Technology
摘 要:提升海上应急搜救能力对保障人民生命安全、维护国家海洋权益、彰显大国责任和担当具有积极作用和深远意义。发达国家海上搜救体系的先进性主要体现在搜救力量专业化、应急响应快捷化、组织协调高效化、搜救业务程序化等方面。文中对美国、英国、澳大利亚、日本4个国家的海上搜救组织构成、搜救力量水平、搜救工作模式等进行了分析,与我国海上搜救体系和机制进行了对比,并从优化搜救组织模式、完善搜救运行机制、健全搜救力量等方面给出了发展我国海上搜救体系的建议。Improving the ability of maritime emergency search and rescue has positive and far-reaching significance for safeguarding people's lives,protecting national maritime rights and interests,and demonstrating the responsibilities of mayor powers.The advanced nature of the maritime search and rescue systems in developed countries is mainly reflected in the specialization of search and rescue forces,the rapid response to emergency situations,the efficiency of coordination and organization,and the proceduralization of search and rescue operations.The composition of maritime search and rescue organizations,the strength of search and rescue forces,and the search and rescue working modes of the United States,Britain,Australia and Japan are analyzed and further compared with the maritime search and rescue system and mechanism in China.In order to optimize the mode,mechanism and capability of the search and rescue organization in China,some suggestions are propased in this paper.
分 类 号:U676.81[交通运输工程—船舶及航道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112