他物权设立合同之性质及特殊性问题研究  

On the Nature and Specific Characteristics of Creation Contract of Ius in Re Aliena

作　　者：章正璋[1] Zhang Zhengzhang(Soochow University)

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院暨东吴公法与比较法研究所,江苏苏州215006

出　　处：《学术界》2020年第2期136-141,238,239,共8页Academics

基　　金：2018年度司法部重点项目“《民法典》物权编中的设权合同问题研究”(18SFB1008)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：设权合同在性质上属于债法合同,具备债法合同的全部要素。设权合同为有名合同,且多为要式合同。《合同法》《物权法》等对设权合同具有适用效力。《物权法》第15条所确立的分离原则对于设权合同具有直接适用之效力,《买卖合同司法解释》第3条亦应类推适用于设权合同。在物权变动形式主义的立法模式下,对于债权意思和物权变动分别把握无疑具有较多的、较好的科学性、合理性,不能也不应该再以物权是否能够依约设立或者依约移转作为判断设权合同是否有效之依据。学界以及实务部门对于在买卖合同中适用分离原则处理债法效力和物权变动业已达成共识,相信亦能够接受分离原则在设权合同中之运用。Like goods sales contract,the creation contract of ius in re aliena in nature belongs to obligatory contract,the Real Right Law of PRC stipulate some kinds of creation contracts of ius in re aliena,so they are typical contracts.At the same time,the creation contracts of ius in re aliena are formal contract,they must be signed with the form of written contract.The Contract Law and the Real Right Law as well as article 15 of the Real Right Law and the distinction principle are directly applicable to the creation contract of ius in re aliena,article 3 of the Judicial Interpretation for Sales Contract by the People's Supreme Court should be applied analogically.Under the formalism legislation mode of real right change,it is undoubtedly more scientific and reasonable to judge the obligatory effect and the change of real right,just as man has done in the sales contract.

关 键 词：设权合同 给付允诺 债法合同 分离原则 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学] D923.6[政治法律—法学]