名称作为严格指示词可以有涵义吗?  

Do Names Have Senses as Rigid Designators?

作　　者：陈吉胜 CHEN Ji-sheng(School of Marxism,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China)

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学马克思主义学院,武汉430079

出　　处：《科学技术哲学研究》2020年第2期51-56,共6页Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务经费“认知模态的本体论、语义学及应用研究”(CCNU19A03004)。

摘　　要：断定作为严格指示词的名称无涵义,可能的原因有两方面:一是直接指称理论与严格指示词理论之间复杂而混乱的关系,二是克里普克反描述主义的基本立场。通过澄清历史与理论的误解并深入剖析克里普克意义理论框架表明,从上述两方面的原因并不能得出名称无涵义的结论。其实,克里普克对名称的描述理论反对并不彻底,名称作为严格指示词,是可以有涵义的。There may be two reasons to claim names as rigid designators have no senses:first,the complex and mixed relation between the theory of rigid designator and the theory of direct reference;second,Kripke’s basic standpoint of anti-descriptivism.However,by clarifying historical and theoretical misunderstandings and analyzing the meaning frame of Kripke in depth,this paper demonstrates that no one can conclude that names have no senses from the two reasons above.In fact,Kripke’s objections to the description theory of names are not complete:names are rigid,at the same time they can have sense.

关 键 词：严格指示 直接指称 认知语境 

分 类 号：N02[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]