论开明自然主义的道德研究  

On the Moral Research in Accordance with the Liberal Naturalism

作　　者：张玉帅[1] 殷杰[1] ZHANG Yu-shuai;YIN Jie(Research Center for Philosophy of Science and Technology,Shanxi University,Taiyuan 030006,China)

机构地区：[1]山西大学科学技术哲学研究中心,太原030006

出　　处：《科学技术哲学研究》2020年第2期57-62,共6页Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology

基　　金：教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目“大脑的本质与现代认知观研究”(18JJD720004);中宣部“文化名家暨四个一批人才项目”(201604002)。

摘　　要：新亚里士多德伦理学借用生物学理论阐释了语境对道德理论的限制作用,哲学的情境主义者使用社会心理学证据揭示了情境对道德行为的巨大影响,应用伦理学研究凸显了语境是实践道德重要来源这一事实。道德在规范伦理学原理层面与应用伦理学实践层面的语境敏感性,决定了实证科学介入道德研究的必要性。而自然化道德研究所取得的丰硕成果在凸显跨学科研究对于道德理论发展重要价值的同时,也暴露了实证科学在推进道德理论方面的局限性。因此,自然化道德研究应当秉承一种开明自然主义的立场,以多元主义的方法论推进道德研究不断发展。The neo-Aristotelian ethics,borrowing the concept of proper function,illustrates that the moral theory is contextually constrained.The philosophical situationists use evidence from social psychology to reveal the considerable influence that the context factors have on moral behavior.The work of applied ethics shows that the particular context is the vital source of morality.The three points collectively show us the morality’s context-sensitivity,which makes the empirical sciences get involved with moral research a necessity.The fruitful achievements of naturalized moral research show that interdisciplinary research is of great value to the development of moral theory,meanwhile,there are also limitations in some aspects of empirical sciences for promoting moral theory.So we need to take the stance of liberal naturalism and promote the development of moral research by adhering to the pluralistic methodology.

关 键 词：语境敏感性 自然化道德研究 开明自然主义 

分 类 号：N02[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]