检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨冰 Yang Bing(Railway Police College,Zhengzhou Henan 450053)
机构地区:[1]铁道警察学院法学系交通法教研室,河南郑州450053
出 处:《警学研究》2020年第1期99-108,共10页Police Science Research
基 金:铁道警察学院2019年度院级教学改革研究项目“交通运输警务背景下的《道路交通安全法学》课程开发与设计”和“《水域警务法律概论》课程开发与设计”的阶段性成果。
摘 要:当前我国公安机关在警察执法权益的保护工作方面常常忽视作为受害人的警察个体权益的保护,这一点在网络辱警案件中尤为突出。各地通过拘留等行政处罚措施维护执法权益的方式存在诸多问题。公安机关既是受害人,又是执法者和行政处罚的决定者,有违程序正义。在这类案件中,应当以维护警察个体权益为目的,由受害民警个人积极提起民事诉讼或刑事自诉,所在的公安机关提供必要帮助,以此来构建合理的警察执法权益保护机制。At present,China’s public security organs often ignore the protection of individual police rights as victims in the protection of police law enforcement rights,which is particularly prominent in cases of Internet stigma.There are many problems in the way that administrative punishment measures such as detention are used to protect law enforcement rights.Public security organs are not only victims,but also law enforcers and decision makers of administrative punishment,which violates procedural justice.In such cases,the purpose of safeguarding the individual rights and interests of the police should be to initiate a civil or criminal private prosecution by the victim police,and the public security agency where he is located provides necessary assistance to build a reasonable police law enforcement rights protection mechanism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.239