警务监控情境下公共领域隐私权研究  

Research on Privacy in Public in Policing Surveillance

作　　者：王欢[1] Wang Huan(Hubei University of Police,Wuhan 430034,China)

机构地区：[1]湖北警官学院学报编辑部,湖北武汉430034

出　　处：《湖北警官学院学报》2020年第1期70-79,共10页Journal of Hubei University of Police

基　　金：湖北警官学院2019年度科研计划项目自选课题“警务监控与隐私保护之衡平研究”(ZX020)。

摘　　要：信息技术的发展促使隐私权保护标准从实际的隐私期待发展为合理的隐私期待并最终转为关注公开的透明度和信息的适度收集。传统的公私二分法以"场所"为标志划定隐私权边界,无法解释并满足公共领域生成的隐私权保护需求。面对警务监控情境中对个人隐私权的不当侵袭,可结合语境完整性理论,形成动态的公共领域隐私权概念,并通过对公共领域个人行为的类别化处理,排除、限制或视情境规制警务监控措施,从公民层面采取隐私权保护步骤,从警务层面构建警察权控制模式,辅以适当性规范和传播流动规范,实现对公共领域隐私权的有效保护和对监控权不当侵袭的有力防御。The development of information technologies promote privacy standard changes from an actual expectation of privacy and a reasonable expectation of privacy to the transparency of publicity and the moderate collection of information. The traditional public-private dichotomy defined privacy with "the place", which cannot interpret or satisfy the needs of privacy protection in public. Facing the improper invasion of policing surveillance to privacy, the dynamic concept of privacy in public should be introduced with the contextual integrity theory. We should take privacy protection steps and constitute power control models by classifying personal behaviors in public to eliminate, limit or regulate policing surveillance in different situations, so as to realize an effective protection of privacy in public and a strong defense to the improper invasion of surveillance along with the appropriateness norms and the communication flow norms.

关 键 词：警务监控 隐私权 公共领域 隐私期待 技术侦查 社会治理 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]