检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]武警新疆总队医院特色二科,新疆乌鲁木齐830000
出 处:《临床医药文献电子杂志》2019年第102期4-4,26,共2页Electronic Journal of Clinical Medical Literature
摘 要:目的探究牙周牙髓联合治疗与单纯牙周治疗对重度牙周炎疗效的临床对比研究。方法选取2018年10月至2019年9月于我院于我院诊治的重度牙周炎患者86例,根据治疗方式的不同将其分为:给予单纯牙周治疗的对照组(n=43例)和采用牙周牙髓联合治疗研究组(n=43例)。比较两组患者治疗前后AL、PD和SBI测量结果及总有效率情况。结果研究组治疗后的AL、PD和SBI水平均优于对照组,组间差异显著(p<0.05);研究者的总有效率(95.35%)高于对照组(76.74%),组间差异显著(x^2=6.20,p=0.01)。结论对重度牙周炎患者采用牙周牙髓联合治疗其疗效更佳,值得优先选择。Objective To explore the clinical comparative study of periodontal pulp combined therapy and periodontal therapy alone in the treatment of severe periodontitis.Methods 86 patients with severe periodontitis who were treated in our hospital from October 2018 to September 2019 were divided into two groups:the control group(n=43 cases)treated with periodontal therapy alone and the study group(n=43 cases)treated with periodontal pulp combined therapy.The results of Al,PD and SBI were compared before and after treatment.Results after treatment,the levels of Al,PD and SBI in the study group were better than those in the control group,with significant difference(P<0.05);the total effective rate of the researchers(95.35%)was higher than that in the control group(76.74%),with significant difference(x 2=6.20,P=0.01).Conclusion the combined treatment of periodontal pulp is more effective for the patients with severe periodontitis,which is worthy of priority.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15