检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贺光辉 HE Guang-hui(School of Law,Hunan University of Humanities,Science and Technology,Loudi,Hunan 417000,China)
机构地区:[1]湖南人文科技学院法学院,湖南娄底417000
出 处:《长江师范学院学报》2020年第2期113-120,124,共9页Journal of Yangtze Normal University
摘 要:《民法典侵权责任编(草案)》(二审稿)第954条关于自甘风险规则的规定,突破了我国现行侵权责任法抗辩事由体系的限制,具有积极的现实意义。但该规定没有周全考虑自甘风险行为类型的不同而将自甘风险规定为一项普遍的抗辩事由,则有失偏颇。未来的民法典侵权责任应明确规定自甘风险规则的适用空间,对自甘风险行为造成的损害应视自甘风险行为的类型不同,分别适用自甘风险规则、公平分担损失规则及比较过失规则来解决。Article 954 of The Draft Tort Liability of the Civil Code(second draft)on the rules about as sumption of risk has broken through the limitation of the current system of defense of tort liability law,which is of positive practical significance.However,it is biased in that the provision fails to take into consideration different types of assumption of risk behavior and makes it a general defense.The writer of this article main tains that the tort liability of the future civil code should clearly stipulate the applicable space of the rules about assumption of risk,and the damage caused by the assumption of risk behavior should be solved accord ing to different types of assumption of risk behaviors,respectively,by applying the rules about the assumption of risk and by the rules about fair loss sharing and comparative negligence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40