李石岑对梁漱溟《东西文化及其哲学》的批评及其与胡适批评的比较  

A Comparative Study on the Criticism of Liang Shuming's Eastern and Western Culture and Their Philosophies between Li Shicen and Hu Shi

作　　者：陈先初[1] CHEN Xian-chu(Yuelu Academy,Hunan University,Changsha 410082,China)

机构地区：[1]湖南大学岳麓书院,湖南长沙410082

出　　处：《杭州师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第2期87-95,共9页Journal of Hangzhou Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：五四时期梁漱溟出版的《东西文化及其哲学》一书,因其提出了著名的中、西、印文化发展的“三个路向说”,以及断定未来世界文化将要走“中国的路”亦即“孔子的路”,而受到中国知识界的广泛批评,李石岑和胡适即置身批评者之列。李、胡二人不约而同地否定梁氏的上述观点,认为中国文化要走以民主、科学、理智为特征的西方文化之路,但是在方法论上,却又有所不同。李氏较多运用了论理的方法即逻辑方法,侧重于指出梁氏观点上的逻辑漏洞;胡适则较多运用了实验主义和进化论的思想方法,侧重于从历史的以及环境与文化之关系的角度对梁氏进行批评和对自己的观点进行论证。二人在方法论上的这一差别,主要是由各自不同的哲学背景所致。Liang Shuming's book“Eastern and Western Culture and Their Philosophies”published during the May 4th Movement was widely criticized by the Chinese intellectual circle as it proposed the famous“Three Directions”for the development of Chinese,Western and Indian cultures,and concluded that the world culture in the future would follow the“Chinese Road”,i.e.“Confucius Road”.Li Shicen and Hu Shi were among the critics.Li and Hu both negated Liang's view,and believed that Chinese culture should follow the road of western culture characterized by democracy,science and reason.However,Li Shicen and Hu Shi were different in terms of methodology as Li used the method of reasoning,i.e.logical method,to point out the logical loopholes in Liang's point of view,while Hu adopted the thought and method of experimentalism and evolutionism,focusing more on the criticism of Liang's idea from the perspective of history and the relationship between environment and culture.It is suggested in this paper that the difference between them in methodology is mainly due to their different philosophical backgrounds.

关 键 词：李石岑 胡适 梁漱溟 文化批评 文化比较 

分 类 号：G02[文化科学]