检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪红飞[1] WANG Hong-fei(Shen Jun Ru Law School,Hangzhou Normal University,Hangzhou 311121,China)
出 处:《杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2020年第2期130-136,共7页Journal of Hangzhou Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
摘 要:由于制定者的过失导致规则不周密,行为人加以积极利用致人损害,违背被害人的真意,该行为应以诈骗罪论处。规则漏洞不是被害人过错,但对于他人违法犯罪行为动机的形成具有一定的刺激作用,从而可以降低行为人的非难可能性,责任程度相对较轻。在处理规则漏洞案件时,法院应当遵循依法独立判断犯罪构成要件和充分考虑预防必要性原则,进行实质判断。Due to the fault of the framer,the rules are not thorough,and the actor makes active use of them to cause damage to others,which violates the true intention of the victim,so the act should be punished as fraud.The loopholes of rules are not the fault of the victim,but they can stimulate the formation of other people's motive of breaking the law and committing a crime to a certain extent,which can reduce the possibility of reproach of the actor,and the degree of responsibility is relatively light.When dealing with the cases of loopholes in the rules,the court should follow the principle of independent judgment of the elements of crime according to the law and full consideration of the necessity of prevention to make substantive judgment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33