知识产权伪造行为的法律规制:一种行政主导下的分流机制  

The Legal Countermeasure of Intellectual Property Forgery: An Administration-based Distributary Regime

作　　者：蔡元臻 CAI Yuan-zhen(School of Law,Shanghai University of Finance and Economics,Shanghai 200433)

机构地区：[1]上海财经大学法学院,上海200433

出　　处：《行政法学研究》2020年第2期109-122,共14页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

基　　金：上海市社科规划青年课题“强保护趋势下网络知识产权滥用与知识产权伪造行为规制研究”(2019EFX005)。

摘　　要：知识产权伪造行为是指在对象内容本身无法作为智力创新成果得到单行法保护的情况下,行为人谎称享有知识产权并对其进行利用或者使用的行为。它区别于一般知识产权侵权,也不属于权利滥用。知识产权伪造行为在我国正面临规制上的困境,主要源于各部门立法的不足和执法联动机制的不彰。我国知识产权行政管理部门在信息化治理模式的完善下将具备更强的信息收集和处理能力,鉴于这一优势,规制知识产权伪造行为应由行政部门主导,承担主动分流案件的职能,从而构建起三轨分流机制。在行为类型化的基础上,刑事司法也将在上述机制中发挥较之以往更为关键的作用。The intellectual property forgery refers to the action of utilizing or using a subject as IP without actual legal entitlement, whilst the subject is also unqualified to be recognized as any form of intellectual innovation to enjoy IP law protection.IP forgery differs from regular IP infringement, and shall not be considered as an abusive use of IP.China’s legal countermeasure of IP forgery is in predicament as a result of the insufficient legislation and ineffective enforcement of various departments of law.The administrative management departments of IP in China are showing stronger capabilities in information collecting and handling with the improvements of informational governance system, in view of this advantage, the said departments shall lead the legal countermeasure of IP forgery, bearing especially the functions of active regulation and case distribution, to eventually establish a distributary triple-track regime.Also based on the categorization of forging actions, the criminal judicature shall play a more critical role among the above-mentioned regime.

关 键 词：知识产权伪造行为 侵犯知识产权罪 行政执法 类型化研究 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]