检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐方榕 李天骄 TANG Fangrong;LI Tianjiao(Law School,Guangxi University for Nationalities,Nangning,Guangxi 530006,China)
出 处:《河池学院学报》2020年第1期100-107,共8页Journal of Hechi University
摘 要:社会相当性理论对我国的立法、司法等各方面具有重要意义,其通过对犯罪的实质评价达到出罪的效果。备受关注的于欢案引起了刑法学界对于合理出罪的大讨论。基于中国目前的法治现状及刑事法治公众认同之需要,正当防卫的判断根据理应采用社会相当性说。若以行为规范性与规范适当性为判断基础,以社会相当性为判断标准,于欢的行为应当成立正当防卫。The theory of social equivalence is of great significance to China’s legislative and judicial aspects,and it achieves the effect of incriminating by evaluating the essence of the crime.The highly concerned case of Yu Huan has caused a great deal of discussion in criminal law circles on reasonable incrimination.Based on the current status of the rule of law in China and the need for public recognition of the rule of criminal law,the judgment of legitimate defense should be based on the theory of social equivalence.If the judgment is based on norms of behavior standardization and normative appropriateness and take social equivalence as judgment standard,Yu Huan’s behavior should be justified in defense.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49