不同体制国家水权交易价格比较研究——以湛江市为例  

Comparative Study of Water Rights Trade Price in Various Countries with Different Systems:A Case Study of Zhanjiang City

作　　者：叶长鑫 苏春生 房春艳[1] 陈晓宏[1,2,3] YE Changxin;SU Chunsheng;FANG Chunyan;CHEN Xiaohong(Center for Water Resources and Environment,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510275,China;Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Water Security Regulation and Control for Southern China,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510275,China;Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Water Security in Southern China of Guangdong High Education Institute,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510275,China)

机构地区：[1]中山大学水资源与环境研究中心,广东广州510275 [2]广东省华南地区水安全调控工程技术研究中心,广东广州510275 [3]华南地区水循环与水安全广东普通高校重点实验室,广东广州510275

出　　处：《人民珠江》2020年第4期1-7,共7页Pearl River

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(51861125203、91547202);广州市水务科技项目(穗污管办合字〔2017〕第28号)。

摘　　要：水权交易是各国利用市场机制优化配置水资源、解决水问题的重要途径。以湛江市为例,运用全成本定价法研究中美2个不同体制国家在水权交易价格上的差异,并进行两国在水权交易价格、水市场建设和监管机制上的水权交易适应性分析。最后提出推进中国水权交易进一步发展的几点建议。Water rights trade is an important way for countries from all over the world to use market mechanisms to optimize water resource allocation and solve water problems.Taking Zhanjiang City as an example,this paper studies the differences in the price of water rights between two different countries——China and the United States by the method of full-cost pricing,analyzes the adaptability of water rights trade on these two countries in terms of the pricing mechanism of water rights trade,and construction,supervision and management mechanism of water rights trade market,and finally puts forward some suggestions for promoting the further development of water rights trade in China.

关 键 词：水权 水权交易 全成本定价法 湛江市 

分 类 号：TV213.4[水利工程—水文学及水资源]