检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:尹文娇[1] 邱丰[1] 周文亭[1] 曹经瑗[1] 刘宏图[1] 毕胜利[1] Yin Wenjiao;Qiu Feng;Zhou Wenting;Cao Jingyuan;Liu Hongtu;Bi Shengli(NHC Key Laboratory of Medical Virology and Viral Diseases,National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention,Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Beijing 102206,China)
机构地区:[1]中国疾病预防控制中心病毒病预防控制所,国家卫生健康委员会医学病毒和病毒病重点实验室,北京102206
出 处:《中华实验和临床病毒学杂志》2020年第1期67-71,共5页Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Virology
基 金:国家科技重大专项(2018ZX10201002-009-002);侯云德院士科研青年基金(2019HYDQNJJ01)。
摘 要:目的比较戊型肝炎病毒(hepatitis E virus,HEV)3种核酸检测方法的敏感性及特异性。方法将HEV基因4型代表株的开放阅读框(open reading frame,ORF)2区部分基因序列克隆至pUC57载体,合成质粒DNA,使用A、B两种实时定量方法检测该质粒,比较最低检出限;使用其他标本做特异性检测。使用3种方法平行检测急性戊肝病例血清标本,比较检测结果。结果A、B方法对质粒DNA的最低检出限均可达35拷贝数/反应,特异度均为100%;A、B和C方法对急性戊肝病例血清标本HEV RNA检出阳性率分别为47.8%(43/90)、43.3%(39/90)和41.1%(37/90),一致率为88.9%(80/90),3种方法的检出率之间无统计学差异(χ^2=0.8414,P=0.6566)。A方法检测Ct值≤34.6或者B方法检测Ct值≤35.6的血清标本,C方法扩增成功率为100%。结论A方法的敏感性和特异性均较高,C方法为灵敏的基因检测方法。Objective To compare the performance of three nucleic acid detection methods for hepatitis E virus.Methods The open reading frame(ORF)2 gene sequence of HEV genotype 4 representative strain was cloned into pUC57 vector.Plasmid DNA was detected by two real-time quantitative method A and B,and the detection limits were compared.Other samples were used for specificity detection.Serum specimens of acute hepatitis E patients were detected by three method,and the results were compared.Results The lowest detection limit of plasmid DNA by A and B method can both reach 35 copies/reaction,with specificity of 100%.The HEV RNA positive rate of serum samples from acute hepatitis E patients by A,B and C method was 47.8%(43/90),43.3%(39/90)and 41.1%(37/90),with the concordance rate of 88.9%(80/90).There was no statistically significant difference among the three method(χ^2=0.8414,P=0.6566).Serum specimens with Ct values below 34.6 detected by method A,or below 35.6 detected by method B,the success rate of amplification by method C was 100%.Conclusions Method A has both higher sensitivity and specificity,and method C is a sensitive gene detection method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4