喜马拉雅旱獭疫源地动物鼠疫疫情发现方式分析  

Analysis on the manners of finding out animal plague epidemic in Himalaya marmot foci

作　　者：张芳[1] 田洁 李昊 姚晓恒[1] 周晓磊[1] ZHANG Fang;TIAN Jie;LI Hao;YAO Xiao-heng;ZHOU Xiao-lei(The Base for plague and Brucellosis Control and Prevention,Chinese Center for Diseases Control and Prevention,Baicheng 137000,China)

机构地区：[1]中国疾病预防控制中心鼠疫布氏菌病防控基地,吉林白城137000

出　　处：《中国地方病防治》2020年第1期21-22,共2页Chinese Journal of Control of Endemic Diseases

摘　　要：目的探讨喜马拉雅旱獭疫源地动物鼠疫疫情的主要发现途径。方法通过对2019年喜马拉雅旱獭疫源地动物鼠疫疫情进行分析,对病死动物检测和捕获动物检测进行比较,从而得出动物鼠疫的主要发现途径。结果 64起动物疫情中,40.63%通过病死动物检测发现,59.37%通过捕获动物检测发现;153份阳性样本中,37.25%通过病死动物检测发现,62.75%通过捕获动物检测发现。结论单从发现疫情效率的角度来说捕获动物检测优于病死动物检测,捕获动物报告是发现动物鼠疫疫情的主要手段。Objective To discuss the main way of discovering animal plague epidemic in Himalaya Marmot foci.Methods To analysis the rodent plague epidemic situation in Himalaya Marmot foci in 2019, the proportion of the foci detected with trapped animal was compared with the self-dead rodents.Results Of all the 64 animal epidemic those detected with self-dead rodent test reach 40.63%, whereas those detected with trapped animal account for 59.37%.There were 37.25% those detected with self-dead rodent test, and those detected with trapped animal account for 62.75%, in 153 positive sample.Conclusion It is better to detect trapped animal than to self-dead rodent reporting, in the view of only detect animal plague epidemic, and detect trapped animal is the main way to detect the epidemic.

关 键 词：鼠疫 喜马拉雅旱獭 疫情 发现方式 

分 类 号：R516.8[医药卫生—内科学]