检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邓倩 王羊 邓群仙 辛亚宁 李雷 龙星雨 祝进[3] 张慧芬 夏惠[4] 梁东[4] DENG Qian;WANG Yang;DENG Qunxian;XIN Yaning;LI Lei;LONG Xingyu;ZHU Jin;ZHANG Huifen;XIA Hui;LIANG Dong(College of Horticulture,Sichuan Agricultural University,Chengdu 611130,China;Linshui County Economic and Fruit Bureau,Guang an 638500,China;Sichuan Horticultural Crop Technical Extension Station,Chengdu 610041,China;Institute of Pomology and Olericulture,Sichuan Agricultural University,Chengdu 611130,China)
机构地区:[1]四川农业大学园艺学院,四川成都611130 [2]四川省广安市邻水县经果局,四川广安638500 [3]四川省园艺作物技术推广总站,四川成都610041 [4]四川农业大学果蔬研究所,四川成都611130
出 处:《浙江农业学报》2020年第4期644-652,共9页Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis
基 金:四川省学术和技术带头人培养资金(2015XDPY);四川农业大学学科建设双支计划;德阳市重点科学技术研究项目(2018CKJ018)。
摘 要:以露地栽培和大棚栽培蜀脆枣为材料,德阳市罗江区当地主栽品种罗江调元枣为对照品种,对枣果实的发育动态、外观品质(单果质量、纵横径、着色指数等)和营养品质(可溶性糖、可滴定酸、抗坏血酸含量等)进行了比较分析。结果表明,蜀脆枣的单果质量和可食率均优于罗江调元枣,且适宜的糖酸比形成了酸甜的口感;通过对蜀脆枣不同栽培方式的比较,发现大棚栽培蜀脆枣成熟期的单果质量显著高于露地栽培蜀脆枣,成熟期比露地栽培蜀脆枣提前了7~14 d,且落果率和裂果率均低于露地栽培蜀脆枣,但大棚栽培和露地栽培蜀脆枣在可食率、糖酸比和果实口感方面差异不大。综上所述,蜀脆枣的果实单果质量高、可食率高、风味酸甜爽口,在罗江区表现引种良好,为罗江区提供了良好的南方鲜食枣新品系引进材料。In the present study, Shucuizao cultivated in open field and in greenhouse were used as materials, and Luojiangtiaoyuanzao, the main local cultivar in Luojiang district of Deyang city, was used as the control. The developmental dynamics, appearance quality(single fruit weight, vertical diameter, coloring index, etc.) and nutritional quality(soluble sugar, titratable acid, ascorbic acid content, etc.) of jujube fruit were compared and analyzed. It was shown that the single fruit weight and edible rate of Shucuizao were better than Luojiangtiaoyuanzao. And the appropriate sugar/acid ratio resulted in a sweet and sour taste. Through the comparison of different cultivation methods of Shucuizao, it was found that the single fruit weight in the mature stage of Shucuizao in greenhouse was significantly higher than that in open field, the maturity period was 7~14 days earlier than that of Shucuizao in open field, and the rate of falling fruit and cracking fruit was lower than that of Shucuizao in open field. However, there was no significant difference in edible rate, sugar/acid ratio and fruit taste between Shucuizao in greenhouse and in open field. In conclusion, Shucuizao had a good performance in high fruit weight, high edible rate and sweet and sour flavor in Luojiang area, which provided a good material for the introduction of new fresh jujube variety in Luojiang area.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.59.209