检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许轶[1] 谢黎[1] 张志强[1] 陈云伟[1] XU Yi;XIE Li;ZHANG Zhiqiang;CHEN Yunwei(Chengdu Library and Information Center,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Chengdu 610041,China)
机构地区:[1]中国科学院成都文献情报中心,成都610041
出 处:《世界科技研究与发展》2019年第4期403-415,共13页World Sci-Tech R&D
基 金:中科院战略研究与决策支持系统建设专项(GHJ-ZLZX-2019-31);中科院中长期规划(GHJ-ZLZX-2019-43)资助。
摘 要:为了从知识产权保护、知识产权服务和高技术产品国际贸易的角度对比分析中国和美国的国际竞争力,本文基于中美两国PCT国际专利申请、马德里商标国际注册申请,以及知识产权服务和高技术产品国际贸易收支数据,比较中美两国技术竞争力和市场控制力。研究发现,中国的知识产权国际申请量增速和贸易规模具有明显优势,但是对技术创新成果的国际保护强度及品牌国际战略布局明显弱于美国;美国在高技术产品贸易方面的领先优势仍然明显。我国应在开放合作中进一步提高自主创新能力,实施国际贸易知识产权先行战略。From the perspective of intellectual property protection,the international trade in intellectual property services and high-tech products,this paper compared the international competitiveness of China and the United States.This paper studied the number of PCT international patent applications and Madrid International Trademark Registrations,the international trade balance data of intellectual property services and high-tech products,aimed at measuring technical competitiveness and market control power of China and the United States.The study found that the growth rate of intellectual property international applications and the scale of international trade of China have obvious advantages,and on the contrary,the intensity of international protection of technological innovation and brand strategic layout is weaker than that of the United States.The United States still takes the leading position of the high-tech trade.China should enhance its independent innovation capability through opening up and collaboration,implement intellectual property priority strategy in the international trade,in order to improve its comprehensive competitiveness.
分 类 号:F064[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3