检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:乔雯钰 王萍[1] 孔巧丽[1] QIAO Wenyu;WANG Ping;KONG Qiaoli(Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao 266590,China)
机构地区:[1]山东科技大学,山东青岛266590
出 处:《测绘与空间地理信息》2020年第3期79-82,共4页Geomatics & Spatial Information Technology
摘 要:针对基线解算质量的提高,除了在野外观测时必须按要求采取相应措施减少各种不利因素的影响外,还需要在必要时通过一定的手段来改进基线向量成果,提高网平差精度。通过南方测绘GNSS数据处理软件对不同卫星高度截止角、历元间隔、参考卫星的选择进行了研究,重点对比分析了各种基线解算方案对基线解算结果的影响,为使用者进行GPS基线解算提供有益的参考。通过实验数据的对比分析可知:在用软件进行基线解算时,需要综合考虑卫星数目的多少、同步观测时间,以及卫星的追踪总结图等。In view of the improvement of the quality of the baseline solution,in addition to the need to take corresponding measures to reduce the influence of various unfavorable factors in the field observation,it is necessary to improve the baseline vector results and improve the network adjustment accuracy through certain means when necessary. The GNSS data processing software of Southern Surveying and Mapping was used to study the selection of different satellite height cutoff angles,epoch intervals and reference satellites.The influence of various baseline solution schemes on baseline solution results was analyzed. Provide useful reference for users to perform GPS baseline solution. Through the comparative analysis of the experimental data,we can know that when using the software to perform the baseline solution,we need to consider the number of satellites,the synchronization observation time,and the satellite tracking summary map.
分 类 号:P228.4[天文地球—大地测量学与测量工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.226.34