检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘亚军[1] 邵思蒙 LIU Ya-jun;SHAO Si-meng
机构地区:[1]吉林大学法学院
出 处:《北方法学》2020年第2期108-117,共10页Northern Legal Science
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“国际知识产权制度的发展趋势和我国的路径选择研究”(17BFX114)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:自从多哈回合谈判陷入僵局之后,各国开始积极谈判自由贸易协议,其中包含的国际经济贸易规则与WTO体系中的国际经济贸易规则有所不同,有学者将这种情形描述为"国际经济贸易规则重构"。知识产权规则作为国际经济贸易规则中的重要部分,各国在此领域的利益各不相同,体现于这些自由贸易协议中的具体规则也各有侧重。其中,网络技术发展作为对知识产权规则的发展变化有所影响的因素,也是各国在签订自由贸易协议时不可忽视的因素之一。在分析几个具有代表性的自由贸易协议中的数字知识产权规则的基础上,可以观察其中数字知识产权保护标准,结合实际情况讨论我国应当作何应对,从而更好地构建我国主导FTA法律框架中相应的知识产权规则。Since the deadlock in the Doha round of negotiations,countries have begun to actively negotiate bilateral or multilateral regional free trade agreements,which contain international economic and trade rules that different from the WTO rules.Some scholars have described the change to be"reconstruction of international economic and trade rules".Intellectual property rules are important parts of the international economic and trade rules.The interests of countries in this field are different,which results in the fact that the concrete intellectual property rules embodied in these free trade agreements have different emphasis.Among them,the development of network technology,as one of the elements that affects the development and changes of intellectual property rules,is also a significant factor that countries cannot ignore when signing the free trade agreement.Based on the analysis of digital intellectual property rules in several representative free trade agreements,we can observe the digital intellectual property protection standard and discuss how China should respond to the actual situation,so as to better build corresponding intellectual property rules in the FTA that China advocates.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15