检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙志农[1] 牟小梅[2] 易保树 SUN Zhi-nong;MOU Xiao-mei;YI Bao-shu(School of Foreign Languages,Anhui Agricultural University,Hefei,Anhui 230036,China;School of Foreign Languages,Suzhou University,Suzhou,Anhui 234000,China;School of Foreign Studies,Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210023,China)
机构地区:[1]安徽农业大学外国语学院,安徽省合肥市230036 [2]宿州学院外国语学院,安徽省宿州市234000 [3]南京邮电大学外国语学院,江苏省南京市210023
出 处:《外语电化教学》2020年第1期71-76,11,共7页Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education
摘 要:本文基于自建教师课堂用语语料库,探究了某届全国大学英语教学比赛获奖教师的课堂请求语使用情况,从言语直接程度和言语修饰策略角度对教师课堂请求语进行分析,并统计了各类策略的使用频率。研究发现:①教师直接型策略的使用明显多于规约型间接策略和非规约型间接策略;②教师使用非修饰策略明显多于言语修饰策略,言语修饰策略主要用于缓和语气。该研究对外语教师通过恰当使用课堂用语提升教学效果具有一定的启示意义。Requests are attempts on the part of a speaker to get the hearer to perform or to stop performing some kind of action(Ellis,2008).Most researches on requests in the literature focused on the request strategies adopted by the students,while the request strategies by the teachers have not got due attention,especially those in the EFL environment.It is believed that in an EFL environment the teachers’use of language is an important input for EFL learners,so the appropriate use of the target language on the part of the teachers is necessary.This study is to investigate the use of request strategies by Chinese college English teachers in class.Based on a self-built corpus of teaching requests,the study investigated the frequency of the requests made in class by the 10 winners of a National Foreign Language Teaching Contest(listening and speaking group).The corpus was collected from the final contest of the 10 teachers,and the requests in the corpus were manually tagged according to the classification of requests put forward by Blum-Kulka(1989)and Sifianou(1992),which divides requests according to their directness and modification,under the labels of direct strategies,conventional indirect strategies,and non-conventional indirect strategies;and internal modification and external modification respectively.AntConc was used to retrieve the requests from the tagged corpus and statistical analysis was made subsequently with SPSS 17.0.The requesting strategies were analyzed in terms of the classifications aforementioned.Moreover,the frequencies of the strategy types were listed.It was found that(1)More direct strategies were used than conventional indirect strategies and nonconventional indirect strategies;(2)More non modification strategies were adopted in class while some mitigation devices were employed to mitigate the requests.The results show that there are differences between the EFL teachers’request strategies and those of the native speakers,which may be due to the influence of the transfer of the mother tongue a
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222