集体经营性建设用地入市的现实困境与理论误区——以“同地同权”切入  

Difficult Position and Theoretical Error of Collective Business Construction Land Market--With the Dimension of“Same Rights for Same Land”

作　　者：吴义龙[1] WU Yilong

机构地区：[1]河南大学法学院,河南开封475001

出　　处：《学术月刊》2020年第4期118-128,141,共12页Academic Monthly

摘　　要：允许集体经营性建设用地与国有建设用地“同地同权”“同等入市”,进而建立城乡统一的建设用地市场,是当下和未来一段时期我国农村土地产权制度改革的方向。如果不对土地的用途管制、规划条件和使用方式进行具体界定,将难以实现“同地同权”,也会夸大市场机制在集体经营性建设用地“一级市场”形成中的作用,进而催生土地食利阶层。由此折射出学界讨论方式的不足:不应从抽象原则出发讨论问题,而要回到现实世界,强调土地的通途管制、规划条件和使用方式的差异性,以及关注差异性所带来的可能后果。It is the direction of reforming rural land property right system in our country in present and near-future periods for“same rights for same lands”and“equal rights for market”of collective business construction land and state-owned construction land.Without concrete definitions of the restriction of landuse,conditions for planning,and ways of land-use,it will be difficult to realize“same rights for same lands”,and also will exaggerate market mechanism’s function in forming“first-class market”of collective business construction land,resulting in the formation of land-rentier class.The deficiency of the discussion method in academic circle is thus reflected.The problems should be discussed not by abstract principles,but by going back to the reality,emphasizing the difference of land-use restriction,the conditions of planning,and ways of usage,as well as their possible serious consequence.

关 键 词：集体经营性建设用地 同地同权 同等入市 城乡统一 规划 

分 类 号：D912[政治法律—法学]