为什么只有抽象劳动才是价值的唯一源泉——从庞巴维克的质疑说起  

Why Is Only Abstract Labor the Sole Source of Value

作　　者：孙宗伟[1] Sun Zongwei

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学马克思主义学院,北京100872

出　　处：《当代经济研究》2020年第3期55-64,F0003,共11页Contemporary Economic Research

基　　金：中国人民大学马克思主义研究基地项目阶段性成果。

摘　　要：把"人类一般劳动"或者"抽象劳动"看作是价值的唯一源泉,这是马克思经济学大厦的基石——劳动价值理论的核心,然而也正是这个理论内核成为了人们对马克思劳动价值理论研究中最富争议、质疑最多的问题之一。长期以来造成人们在这个问题上的种种争论乃至误解,最主要的原因,就是未能弄懂马克思在价值实体和价值形式分析中所运用的方法。从庞巴维克对劳动价值论的质疑说起,运用马克思的分析方法,可以从历史和逻辑相结合的角度揭开抽象劳动作为价值实体之谜。It is the core of the labor value theory,which is the cornerstone of Marxist economics,to view"human general labor"or"abstract labor"as the sole source of value.However,this core of the theory has become one of the most controversial and questioned issues about research on Marxist labor value theory.The main reason that has caused peopled various disputes and even misunderstandings on this issue for a long time is the failure in understanding the methods Marx used in the analysis of value entities and forms.This article starts with the questioning of the labor value theory by Bohm-Bawerk,and tries to use Marx’s analysis method to uncover the mystery of abstract labor as a value entity from the perspective of combining history and logic.

关 键 词：价值 交换价值 价值形式 抽象劳动 具体劳动 历史与逻辑相结合方法 

分 类 号：F014.3[经济管理—政治经济学]