检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李斌 拓阳阳 孙志平 叶朝兴 叶茂[2] 孙学永[3] LI Bin;TUO Yang-yang;SUN Zhi-ping(Liangshan Company Dechang Branch of Sichuan Tobacco Company,Dechang,Sichuan 615500)
机构地区:[1]四川省烟草公司凉山州公司德昌分公司,四川德昌615500 [2]安徽中烟工业有限责任公司原料部,安徽合肥230088 [3]安徽省农业科学院烟草研究所,安徽合肥230031
出 处:《安徽农业科学》2020年第8期38-40,共3页Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基 金:四川优质特色烤烟新品种选育及示范项目(SCYC201901)。
摘 要:采用常规2次采收、一次性采收和一次性带茎砍收3种上部叶采收方式,研究其对上部叶烤后烟叶的质量和经济效益的影响。结果显示,与常规采烤相比,上部烟叶一次性采烤和带茎砍烤采收的烤后烟叶经济性状、外观质量均有显著提高,内在化学成分显著优化,但单叶重略有下降。带茎砍烤的整体烘烤时间比常规烘烤延长24 h,用工成本、耗煤成本及耗电成本均高于常规和一次性采烤方式。综合考虑烟叶质量和效益,上部一次性采收和带茎砍收方式是适宜于德昌县推广的上部叶采收方式。The effects of different harvesting methods on the quality and economic benefit of tobacco leaves after curing were studied by using three kinds of upper leaf harvesting methods,including conventional two-times harvesting,one-off harvesting and one-off cutting with stems.The results showed that compared with the conventional harvesting,the economic benefit and appearance quality of the upper tobacco leaves were significantly improved,and the internal chemical composition was significantly optimized,but the single leaf weight decreased slightly.The whole curing time with stem was 24 h longer than that of conventional baking,and the labor cost,coal consumption cost and power consumption cost were higher than those of conventional and one-off curing methods.Considering the quality and benefit of tobacco leaves,the upper one-off harvesting and stem cutting are suitable for the upper leaf harvesting in Dechang County.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30