误会与想象--透过对“铜雀瓦砚”的认识谈艺术品的塑造  

Misapprehension and Imagination: A Talk about Shaping Artworks from The ‘Tile-shaped Clay Inkstones of The Tongque Terrace’

作　　者：王子奇[1] Wang Ziqi

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院考古研究所

出　　处：《故宫博物院院刊》2020年第3期76-84,110,共10页Palace Museum Journal

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目《隋唐宋元时期瓦作遗存的考古学研究》(批准号:18CKG019)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：清乾隆朝所修《西清砚谱》卷一中收录的几方"铜雀瓦砚",当时被认定为汉砚,备受重视。本文通过近年来邺城地区考古发现的瓦作遗存,判定这几方瓦砚并非汉砚。铜雀瓦砚在宋代即受到追捧,而实际上,"铜雀瓦砚"并非东汉晚期的铜雀台瓦,是使用东魏北齐时期压磨黑光瓦件所制。在这一结论基础上,作者透过"铜雀瓦砚"的诞生,分析了某些艺术品的塑造,不单纯只是匠人的创作,还夹杂着历史、想象与物质的复杂互动。In the thesis is presented the production context of a kind of traditional Chinese inkstone named Tongque Tile-shaped Inkstone(Tóng Què Wǎ Yàn in Chinese pinyin) which has been thought to be made of the tiles from the Tongque Terrace construction of ancient Yecheng County. The analysis of the Tongque tile-shaped inkstones included in the volume of Xiqing Yanpu which records the ink-stone history of the royal collection concludes that they are the products of the Eastern Wei-Northern Qi period instead of the late Han dynasty, and that they are made of a kind of black polished tiles in the Yecheng Site instead of the tiles from the Tongque terrace. It is therefore indicated from the case that shaping artworks goes with artists’ imagination, history and materials as well as their craftsmanship.

关 键 词：铜雀瓦砚 《西清砚谱》 瓦作 

分 类 号：K875.4[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学]