“一带一路”背景下泰国政府治理改革与绩效考察——对“一带一路”沿线国家的风险提示  

Thailand Governance Reform and Assessment under the Construction of "the Belt and Road"-- Risk warnings for "the Belt and Road" countries

作　　者：耿旭[1] 刘华云 Geng Xu;Liu Huayun(College of Management/College of Social Sciences,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen 518060,Guangdong)

机构地区：[1]深圳大学管理学院,广东深圳518060 [2]深圳大学社会科学学院,广东深圳518060

出　　处：《江苏师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第1期111-122,124,共13页Journal of Jiangsu Normal University：Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目“质量驱动的公共服务标准化研究:理论建构、机制设计与应用策略”(项目编号:71704112);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“中国基层协商民主中代表参与机制构建研究”(项目编号:17YJC810008)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：“一带一路”沿线国家在政治制度、经济发展和文化上的显著差异导致合作中存在潜在风险,这需要各个国家审视并通过良好的内部治理来规避。以泰国为对象,通过对其政府治理改革历史的考察,发现改革集中于权力结构、政府功能、管理操作和社会治理四个层次。利用世界银行的六个治理指数审视其改革绩效,发现在东盟国家中泰国的治理绩效较好,但显示出极大的不稳定性和风险性。这一绩效结果与其外生嵌入式的治理改革模式密切相关,导致诸如公共价值缺失、区域发展差异巨大、地方保护主义盛行等新问题产生,这些既是泰国政府未来治理改革的重点,也是“一带一路”沿线国家改革需要避免之处。Significant differences in political systems,economic development and culture between the Belt and Road countries lead to potential risks in cooperation,which need to be examined by each country and avoided through good internal governance.For the Thailand reform history,it can be found that the reform involves four aspects including the authority structure,the government function,management operation and social governance.By comparing six governance indicators of the World Bank,it can be seen that Thailand governance performance is not bad among ASEAN countries,but it shows great instability and the unbalanced development between different index.This performance is related to its exogenous embedded mode of governance reform and has generated new problems such as the lack of public value,regional difference and poverty and local protectionism.These are not only the important problems must be focused on in future reform by Thailand,but also be avoided by the Belt and Road countries.

关 键 词：一带一路 泰国政府治理 风险评估 治理模式 绩效评估 

分 类 号：D523[政治法律—政治学]