检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民公安大学,北京100032 [2]杭州市公安局拱墅区分局祥符派出所,浙江杭州310014
出 处:《四川警察学院学报》2020年第2期111-116,共6页Journal of Sichuan Police College
摘 要:我国警察行使防卫权的主观标准方面尚不明确,权利行使面临着舆论质疑和制度约束的双重压力,主观上存在着危急情境难界定的困惑,进而导致客观上警察防卫难进行的现实问题。警察防卫权与正当防卫权有诸多相似之处,应当参考正当防卫理论中主观方面标准的防卫意识学说,在生命威胁原则大前提之下,采"防卫认识""防卫意志"的概然性标准重构警察防卫权行使的主观标准,保障警察防卫权的规范行使,保护人民警察自身及人民群众的合法权益。The subjective criteria for police exercising defense right in China is still unclear, which leads to double pressure from public opinion and system restraint, confusion about defining the critical situation, and difficulty in carrying out self-defense for the police.There are many similarities between police defense right and justifiable defense right, so it is feasible to reconstruct subjective criteria for police exercising defense right with probability criteria of defense awareness under the premise of life threat referring to relevant theory in justifiable defense to ensure the standardized exercise of police defense right and protect legitimate interests of the police and the people.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.13.56