民法典编纂中法定地役权的体系融入与制度构造  

System Integration and Institutional Construction of Statutory Servitude in the Compilation of Civil Code

作　　者：于凤瑞[1] Yu Fengrui

机构地区：[1]广东外语外贸大学土地法制研究院,广东广州510420

出　　处：《新疆社会科学》2020年第1期86-93,151,152,共10页Social Sciences in Xinjiang

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“土地立体化利用中的权利冲突及其法律规制”(19CFX060);教育部人文社会科学项目“城市治理中的地役权适用研究”(17YJC820062);国土资源部城市土地资源监测与仿真重点实验室重点研究项目“土地立体化利用中的空间建设用地使用权之权利冲突研究”(KF-2018-03-037)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：民法典应否规定法定地役权取决于实践需求及其化解实务难题的能力。以公用事业管线通行关系为例的实践考察表明,法定地役权实际存在于我国社会实践与法律规范之中。现行法关于公用事业用地的物权制度供给不足导致其用地关系各自为政,不仅用地单位的利益诉求缺少明确的请求权基础,既有土地权利人之财产权亦难以获得有效保障。文章认为法定地役权在调和私法自治与公法管制方面具有独特功能,民法典应对其作出原则规定以统领各特别法,各具体类型法定地役权的内容仍由特别法主导调整。Whether the Civil Code should prescribe the statutory servitude depends on its practical needs and ability to resolve practical problems.The practical study of the public utility pipeline shows that statutory servitude actually exists in China's social practice and legal norms.The current law provides insufficient supply of property rights for public utilities,land use relationships of various public utilities lack unity.Not only the units using land lacks a clear basis for claim,existing property rights holders are also difficult to obtain effective protection.Statutory servitude has its unique function in reconciling autonomy of private law and control of public law,the Civil Code should prescribe principled provision in order to guide special laws,the content of various types of statutory servitude are still adjusted by special laws.

关 键 词：法定地役权 准征收 民法典 公私法关系 

分 类 号：D923.49[政治法律—民商法学]