检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冯海波 胡继胜 FENG Haibo;HU Jisheng(School of Electronics and Information Engineering,Dalian Jiaotong University,Dalian 116028,China)
机构地区:[1]大连交通大学电气信息工程学院,辽宁大连116028
出 处:《电机与控制应用》2020年第4期64-70,76,共8页Electric machines & control application
摘 要:针对内燃机车永磁同步发电系统电机运行效率和功率因数较低的问题,应用最大转矩电流比(MTPA)控制策略来控制牵引变流器,并分析电压极限椭圆限制下的MTPA控制,与单位功率因数控制和id=0控制策略下的功角、功率因数和效率进行对比。仿真对比分析表明:id=0控制调速范围较窄,单位功率因数控制高转速下运行不稳定,MTPA控制可以在全速范围内稳定运行,并且提高了永磁同步发电机的功率因数和效率,增加了系统的稳定性。Aiming at the problems of low efficiency andlow power factor of the motor in the permanent magnet synchronous power generation system of diesel locomotive,the maximum torque per ampere(MTPA)control strategy is adopted to control the traction converter,and the MTPA control under the limitation of voltage limit ellipse is analyzed.The power angle,power factor and efficiency are compared under the unity power factor control and id=0 control strategies.The simulation and comparison analysis shows that the speed regulation range of the id=0 control is very narrow,the unity power factor control is unstable at high speeds,while the MTPA control can run stably in the full speed range.Furthermore,the power factor and efficiency of the permanent magnet synchronous generator are improved with MTPA control,and the stability of the system is improved.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.80