检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王雪[1] 付丽媛 常健[1] WANG Xue;FU Li-yuan;CHANG Jian(Zhou Enlai School of Government,Nankai University,Tianjin 300350,China)
机构地区:[1]南开大学周恩来政府管理学院,天津300350
出 处:《内蒙古大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2020年第1期50-55,共6页Journal of Inner Mongolia University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社科规划项目(项目批准号:19BZZ048)。
摘 要:对基层矛盾纠纷化解机制的研究经历了研究重心从强化、增元到共建共治共享的转变。这种转变的原因在于新时期基层矛盾纠纷更加复杂多样,纠纷化解机制日益多元化,纠纷当事人对纠纷化解机制选择偏好出现变化,以及各类纠纷化解机制存在的自身问题和协同衔接问题。各地在纠纷化解共建共治共享机制建设方面的创新模式聚焦于纵向资源整合和横向协作衔接。这些探索实践面临着一些新的困境,一些学者提出了摆脱这些困境的方向和路径。The research on the mechanism of resolving conflicts and disputes at the grass-roots level has experienced a shift from strengthening the effectiveness and increasing the subject to co-construction, co-governance and co-sharing. The reason for this transformation lies in the complexity and diversity of grassroots conflicts and disputes in the new era, the increasing diversification of dispute resolution mechanisms, the change of the parties’ preference for dispute resolution mechanisms, as well as the problems and coordination problems of various dispute resolution mechanisms. The innovative modes of co-construction, co-governance and co-sharing mechanism of dispute resolution in different regions focus on the vertical integration of resources and the horizontal connection. These exploration practices are faced with some new dilemmas, which some scholars have proposed the directions and paths to get rid of.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249