检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李燕 刘耀明[1] LI Yan;LIU Yao-ming(Huangshi Aikang Hospital,Huangshi 435000,China)
机构地区:[1]黄石爱康医院,湖北黄石435000
出 处:《临床医学研究与实践》2020年第12期50-51,共2页Clinical Research and Practice
摘 要:目的分析腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床效果。方法随机将纳入的81例患者分成对照组(40例,腹腔镜胆总管切开探查取石术)和观察组(41例,腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术)。比较两组的临床效果。结果观察组的手术时间、住院时间、术后进食时间均短于对照组,术中出血量及住院费用均少于对照组(P<0.05)。术后2周,观察组的GSRS评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论针对胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者采用腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术的临床疗效明显,值得应用与推广。Objective To analyze the clinical effect of laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis.Methods A total of 81 patients were enrolled and randomly divided into control group(40 cases,laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and calculus extraction)and observation group(41 cases,laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration).The clinical effects of the two groups were compared.Results The operative time,hospitalization time and postoperative feeding time of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group,and the intraoperative blood loss and hospitalization expenses were less than those of the control group(P<0.05).Two weeks after the operation,the GSRS score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion For patients with cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis,the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration is obvious,which is worthy of application and promotion.
关 键 词:腹腔镜 经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术 胆囊结石 胆总管结石
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229