人工智能生成内容的法律主体之问及其解决方案  

On the Legal Subject of the Creation Generated by Artificial Intelligence and Its Solution

作　　者：孙山[1] SUN Shan(Economic Law School, Northwest University of Political Science and Law, Xi’an 710063, China)

机构地区：[1]西北政法大学经济法学院,陕西西安710063

出　　处：《山东科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第3期17-23,共7页Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目(19AFX017)。

摘　　要：对于人工智能生成内容的著作权法保护,应当将何种主体设定为生成内容的法律主体,目前学界尚无统一看法。法学研究应当立足于现实,而不是根据猜测。人工智能生成内容的主体之问的实质,是财产权归谁所有,并不包括责任承担。法律主体所经历的从“人可非人”到“非人可人”的历史变迁,无法推导出应当赋予人工智能法律主体资格的结论。主体资格的承认不但不会对人工智能本身的行为选择产生影响,相反,将会在扼杀相关产业发展的同时颠覆整个法律制度,完全不可取。现实条件下较为理性的选择,是从法学和产业的双重视角出发,将人工智能的所有人视为人工智能生成内容的作者,由其享有著作财产权,但排除其享有著作人身权。At present,there is no unified view in academia on which subject should be set as the legal subject of the creation generated by artificial intelligence when being protected by the copyright law.The study of law should be based on reality,not on guesswork.The essence of the subject of the creation generated by artificial intelligence is who owns the property rights rather than who takes on the responsibility.The historical change of legal subject from“Humans can be non-human”to“Non-humans can be human”cannot derive the conclusion that artificial intelligence should be qualified as the legal subject.The recognition of subject qualification will not only affect the behavior choice of artificial intelligence itself,on the contrary,it will stifle the development of related industries and even subvert the entire legal system,which is totally undesirable.Under the realistic conditions,from the dual perspectives of law and industry,it is rational to regard the owner of artificial intelligence as the author of the creation generated by artificial intelligence,who enjoys property rights of the work but is excluded the possibility of enjoying personal rights of the work.

关 键 词：人工智能 人工智能生成内容 法律主体 作者 财产权 

分 类 号：DF523.1[政治法律—民商法学]