论大合议庭中陪审员对事实的认定  

On the Identification of Facts by Jurors in the Grand Collegiate Bench

作　　者：郑旭[1] 陈诗怡 ZHENG Xu;CHEN Shi-yi(School of Criminal Justice,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《太原师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2020年第1期79-83,共5页Journal of Taiyuan Normal University:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：《中华人民共和国人民陪审员法》规定七人合议庭审判案件的,人民陪审员仅可对事实认定独立发表意见并表决,不可就法律适用进行表决。但是该法及我国三大诉讼法均未对事实问题与法律问题的区分标准作出明确的规定。人民陪审员参审权限内的事实问题应当指某一行为或事件是否发生或客观存在,而事实确定后的后果则属于法律问题,但从法理以及司法实践来看,部分事实问题仍然由职业法官进行认定,例如非法证据的排除以及证据是否采信。大合议庭审理案件中人民陪审员可以通过听取证人证言、向证人发问以及勘验犯罪现场认定案件事实,准确参与审判,保证司法民主得到落实。The People’s Assessor Law of the People’s Republic of China stipulates that in a case tried by a seven-member collegial panel,the people’s assessors can only express their opinions and vote on the facts independently,in other words,they have no right to vote on legal issues.However,neither this law nor the three major procedural laws of China have clearly defined the criteria for distinguishing factual issues from legal issues.The factual problems within the jurisdiction of people’s assessors should refer to whether an act or event has occurred or exists objectively,while the consequences of the fact determination belong to legal issues.This paper attempts to explore the scope and specific methods of people’s assessors’determination of facts in the trial of cases by the Grand collegial panel,so as to enable people’s assessors to participate in the trial accurately and ensure the implementation of judicial democracy.

关 键 词：人民陪审员 参审制 事实问题 问题列表 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]